Sunday, November 25, 2012

Technical

Cinematography and how the film was shot, presented by Billy Latta

     Cinematography is commonly mentioned when discussing films; however, the term can be lackadaisically referenced without a proper understanding of the topic. Cinematography encompasses a broad range of filming techniques. How the film is shot through the use of narratives devices, angles, sequences, editing, and other technicalities are all a part of cinematography. Suruchi Puri of Read & Digest states cinematography as “the process of creating picture images in motion.” The process presents itself as an art in discovering what means are required to create a cohesive, intentional, and convincing display of motion picture images.

Steve Lee of Yahoo! Contributor Network adds, “The Cinematographer is responsible for the work of the lighting and camera crews, working with the films [sic] director to achieve his vision of the film prior to the editing process. He can create the look of different periods in history and change the mood of the film as it is created according to notes made to the ‘Shooting Script.’”

The extend of understanding a film’s cinematography depends on the amount of released information about the topic in addition to what viewers can determine after watching a film. One can find numerous sites, books, and additional sources of cinematography content pertaining to acclaimed films such as Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings, George Lucas’s Star Wars, and James Cameron’s Avatar. Meanwhile, small documentaries that are scarcely known to the public, such as Gail Dolgin and Vicente Franco’s Daughter from Danang, will require viewer observation to understand the cinematography.

Presented with eight different awards1, Daughter from Danang has displayed commendable cinematography. The film is a documentary style with an approach that intends to emotionally touch viewers with both sentiments of joy and sorrow. Dolgain and Franco achieve their heartfelt experience through the use of original footage, “pseudo-flashbacks,” individual narratives, and audio-video layover.

ORIGINAL FOOTAGE

     Throughout the film viewers will notice the use of footage from the Vietnam War era (circa 1955-1975).  Viewers will see scenes from the original airlifts, troops patrolling, and soldiers fighting. This footage is noticeably different than the footage that directors Gail Dolgin and Vicente Franco capture. Majority of Dolgin and Franco’s footage was strategic; whereas veteran footage was unforeseen. Newsmen and other cameramen were recording “on the run.” Footage was happening with no thought toward camera angles, shot type, lighting, or composition. The film was meant to be captured for the sake of broadcasting current events to the world.

Filming Heidi’s current story (now dated to 2002), although similar in it being filmed as it happened, demonstrated planned filming. Cinematographers had time to register events and make decisions on what and how to film. The decision to subjectively portray the story through handheld camera shooting helps convey a documentary style and intimate feeling. The most significant crossover is the breakdown scene where recorders could not have anticipated coming events. Heidi changed location, her mood, and her position so dramatically that the camera angles had to adjust the best they could to capture what was happening.

The use of both original and current (Dolgin and Franco’s) film contributes to other cinematic devices that help to create an intentional, emotional experience.

FLASHBACKS

     Original footage is not only used to display images of the Vietnam War events, but to also portray simulated, particular flashbacks of Heidi and her Vietnamese family. Since Dolgin and Franco did not have footage of Heidi and her Vietnamese family’s actual past, they used that I call “pseudo-flashbacks.” In other words, they used original footage of other children, families, and events to depict what actually happened to Heidi and her family. For example, as Heidi described her father as a military man, the directors would put in video of soldiers from the war to imply that one of the soldiers may have been Heidi’s father. The directors would include video of a child being taken away from her mother. Although it may not have been Heidi and her mother, the video implies it was them being separated and this makes more of an impact than just hearing Heidi, or her mom, say they were separated. Providing the audience with a visual context in the form of pseudo-flashback helps to enhance an emotional response by viewers.


INDIVIDUAL NARRATIVES

     Flashbacks require a story being told. The directors accomplished this through individual narratives, particularly those of Heidi and her mother, Mai Thi Kim. Documentary styles are notorious for director’s impasse interaction with their subject(s). Nevertheless, it is common now that directors conduct interviews with their subjects in order to include that point-of-view/story with their film content. The mesh of unhindered, natural, action with progressive feedback helps create 1) a genuine account of what is felt by the subject(s) of the film and 2) an emotional experience for viewers watching the events and emotions unfold on screen.

Each interview is meant to enlighten and expressively move the audience toward understanding the people on screen. One of the most significant interviews was when Heidi’s brother, Do Trong Tinh, still felt the need to explain the Vietnamese culture about money and support. He was sorry and did not mean for it to inflict pain or harm, but that apology needed to be shown to communicate the misunderstanding and sympathy. The language barrier makes communicating challenging which ultimately makes it more difficult for audience members to empathize. The interviews provided the audience with a more verbal understanding because of the translations of what people’s thought processes were at the time. A director’s decision to include certain components, such as interviews and translation, try to move viewers to an understanding perspective of what is really happening.

AUDIO-VIDEO LAYOVER

     Adding to the visuals of original footage, pseudo-flashbacks, and individual narrative, the conscious decision to overlay audio into different video shots helped to optimize understanding and emotional response. Narrative would begin with the camera focused on the person speaking. The shot would then transition to a completely different scene but continue the dialogue into that new picture. Again, this is intended to heighten the emotional depth of the words and story being spoken.

Two examples are when 1) Heidi’s brother expresses the happiness of his family reuniting with their father and 2) Heidi is overwhelmed by continuing her stay in Vietnam. In one interview, Do Trong Vinh expresses the joy in his father’s return from the war. The words of Do Trong Vinh continue as the shot switches to modern, color footage of the 22nd Anniversay Parade in Vietnam celebrating the war’s end; crowds cheering; and people patriotically waving flags. Likewise, cheerful music plays at such moment in the film. Meanwhile, an eerie and trilling mandolin plays when Heidi is being overwhelmed by the thought of remaining in Vietnam. The audience does not only hear Heidi talking about her discomfort, they see it. As Heidi narrates, viewers get glimpses of Heidi walking by herself, large pans of the Vietnamese landscape, and people working the crops and fields of Vietnam. The scenes and narration communicate a feeling of distance in a foreign environment.


Works Cited

Lee, Steve. What is Cinematography?. Yahoo! Inc., 25 Mar. 2006. Web. 28 Nov. 2012.
<http://voices.yahoo.com/what-cinematography-26012.html?cat=40>.

Puri, Suruchi. What is Cinematography. Read & Digest. Web. 28 Nov. 2012.
<http://readanddigest.com/what-is-cinematography/>.

End Note

1 Awards may be viewed at the following webpage: http://www.daughterfromdanang.com/about/awards.html

17 comments:

  1. What a detailed technical part. This was all arranged very well. I liked how you mentioned how the footage did not include thought to camera angles/lighting etc. It must have been difficult to be recording like that while running. As a viewer, it also made things quite interesting. I really felt like I was in the movie. I also felt like the cinematic devices used during this film increased the power of the message. Sometimes, little things can make a big difference.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for the comment Amber. I feel like the directors and other cinematographers really did not want to make the film making techniques prevalent. They were most concerned with the story and emotion that was being told and they certainly did not want to take away from that with unique camera angles or detailed lighting. That is reserved for more modern, entertainment films as we may see in the highly digitized movies such as Thor, Alice in Wonderland, Inception, and so forth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very nice job! You discussed very many interesting points! One type of technique that I found most interesting was the flashback technique used in this film. Typically when flashbacks are portrayed in films, I notice them more in a fuzzy almost cloud-like hue. This film, however, used a different technique that seemed more like a slow motion blur through scenes. Very good though! I love all of your information!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tend to think of flashbacks at a fuzzy haze also. Most vivid in my mind would be the Tom Riddle flashbacks from Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. The flashbacks in Daughter of Danang however were nothing like those flashbacks. It seemed almost as if the documentary's recollections played almost as prominent a role as did the shots that the directors took themselves. The flashbacks carried a strong weight of information and emotion.

      Delete
  4. Wow.. very, very detailed blog! This was an awesome job of putting everything together neatly. You provided many interesting and well educating points. I thought it fit well with you adding in the pictures to depict what you were talking about and this helped understand it very well! Again, real nice job on this topic!
    -Michael Chack

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Michael. I also find organization and a few highlighted points to help communicate more clearly. I'm a very visual learner and that's why I put the photographs into my descriptions. I think reading my words is effective; however, placing a photo aids in stronger remembrance of an event or moment in the film. It also helped to support the statements I was making.

      Delete
  5. Best cinematic overview yet. You really got into the nitty gritty details of cinematography and Daughter From Danang in particular. I especially like how you included and incorporated you tube videos of the scenes in which you described. I agree that cinematography is often times generalized, but you took it to another level here. We learned about some of these things in our early readings and assignments in the beginning of this class, but some we did not. It is obvious to me you have done your homework. Did you have any prior knowledge about this kind of stuff before doing this blog? If you are interested in this further, I found a few good links for you:

    http://www.cinematography.net/

    http://www.theasc.com/

    http://youtu.be/rSo_bMFT5YI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate the compliment Scott. Prior to this class, I did not know a lot of the material we've covered this semester. I love the cinema and seeing new movies. I'm huge into franchise movies and monumental films such as Avatar, Harry Potter, Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and so forth. My aunt has a Masters in Theatre so I would have brief conversations with her about some film elements after I watched certain movies. I would say how I liked the music or the computer effects were intriguing. Now I have a whole new arsenal of vocabulary and thought process to utilize. When I watch the Oscars in upcoming years I will not understand what cinematography actually means.

      These links are fantastic! Thanks for recommending them to me. I like the YouTube one because it seems like an extension of the classroom where someone is speaking to me. The other two are also great and I'm looking forward to exploring them more.

      Delete
  6. Billy, Amazing Post! I agree that the camera angles and the unchoreographed movements of Heidi were a challenge, but depicted a sense of realism to the movie. The flashbacks with live/vintage footage was a great addition to setting up the story and the desire to reunite the family. You certainly gave a great deal of thought to the post.

    John Sudar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks John! I look at those "unchoreographed" (don't know if that is a real word or not, but we're rolling with it--haha) moments as the masterpiece moments. One of my majors is Art and it seems that some of my best work has been produced in the most uncalled for and most unanticipated moments. It's raw, but it's magnificent.

      Delete
  7. I really like the technique of pseudo-flashbacks. The viewers are in a way tricked into believing that these are flashbacks of the actual people or events but in reality the scene doesn't feature any of them. It is a creative way to showcase flashbacks that you don't actually have, and the viewers probably don't even think twice about it. I know I had no idea that filmmakers did this at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When we finally slow down and think about the film's footage it does not make sense that the directors would have actual footage of their protagonists from many years ago. I suppose home video today could be helpful for a more modern documentary, but this was taking place back in the 70s, not to mention a lot of the footage was from Vietnam. Home videos were out of the question back then. Dolgin and Franco really did a tremendous job in utilizing the footage they had to unify with the narration/dialogue they were able to capture from the film's characters.

      Delete
  8. Billy, great job with this! You did an excellent job at identifying the different techniques used and then following them up with specific examples. I particularly liked how you included the YouTube videos in case we couldn't remember the scene your were referring to. I like how you used the term "pseudo-flashback" to describe the style the directors used which was a little different than a usual flashback. I though that technique was the most effective cinematic device used. As you said, seeing a child being taken away from his/her mother connected with me emotionally much more than just hearing the mother say it. They did a good job of making the flashbacks seem like they were real as well.

    -Nicole Eshelman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment Nicole. I'm on page with you 100%. I think these pseudo-flashbacks were definitely the most memorable and best contribution the directors incorporated in the film. We are not just audible learners. We like to see things. We're wired to react to our vision.

      Delete
  9. Excellent summary of both the technical aspects and methodology and mindset of the film-makers. You did a great job of considering the details and assessing how the scenes were pieced together to create the final product. I liked how you explained how the pseudo-flashbacks tied the past to future. I think without these, the viewers would not have been able to connect with the action with such emotion and empathy. The translations and voice overs also helped fully explain the emotional reactions by Heidi. Being adopted myself, I was immediately drawn to the content of this film, but really became emotionally vested because of the various cinematic methods. It seemed that the documentary became true to life for me. - Jeremiah Yoder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a tough film to watch at times, but I think there was definitely a point of connection intended for some viewer. I connected through an enhanced understanding after watching the film. It seems you may have had a more intimate draw to the film's content. That is excellent! It's fair to say that Dolgin and Franco did an exceptional job in evoking an emotional response through their display of cinematic and narrative devices.

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete